Use case: Substitution of beryllium in copper alloys

© Fraunhofer IWM
Calculated Ni3Al phase fraction (left) and Cu content in the matrix (right) at room temperature in CuNiAl alloys. The temperature ranges for a possible solution annealing are superimposed on the diagrams as lines (marked with arrows).

Copper-beryllium alloys (Cu-Be) are characterized by their high strength and electrical conductivity and are therefore often used in electrical connectors. However, beryllium is harmful to health and is produced in only a few countries outside Europe, creating a supply risk. There is therefore a strong need to find alternatives that retain the excellent properties of Cu-Be alloys. Fraunhofer IWM has taken on this challenge in a project with other research institutes and industry partners and has identified Cu-Ni-Al alloys as promising substitute materials.

The materials science challenge lies particularly in the microstructure-based modeling of high-temperature strength. It is crucial to understand the complex interactions between the process parameters and the resulting materials properties in order to achieve the desired microstructure. This requires precise control of microstructure development and mechanical properties during heat treatment to achieve optimal properties such as increased hardness and improved wear resistance.

In the case of Cu-Ni-Al alloys, high strength is achieved through the formation of fine L12 phase (Ni, Cu)3Al precipitates with a size of 10 nm to 20 nm. These precipitates hinder dislocation motion in the lattice and lead to the strengthening of the alloy. Through thermodynamic-kinetic calculations, the radius of these precipitates can be precisely predicted and integrated into a model that describes the yield strength and creep properties of the alloys. This theoretical understanding is crucial for making targeted substitutions.

Our research and development services:

  • Microstructural analysis: Examination of microstructural evolution using microscopy to identify precipitation phases and their morphology.
  • Thermodynamic-kinetic modeling: Modeling of microstructural evolution to optimize alloy composition and process parameters.
  • Mechanical characterization: Determination of mechanical properties such as yield strength and creep behavior to validate the models.
  • Identification and evaluation of alternative alloying elements: Development of methods to identify and evaluate substitute materials for critical elements.
  • Determination of the chemical composition of the surface layer: Analysis of the chemical composition using emission spectroscopy.
  • Measurement of local hardness changes: Evaluation of surface quality using nanoindentation.
  • Determination of tribological parameters: Evaluation of the wear behavior of the treated surfaces.

to top